Legal Opinion
Hamner v. White
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 5, 1949No. 32743PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The defendants claim that the award of the board is contrary to law, in that the evidence demanded a finding that the death of the claimant’s husband did not arise out of and during the course of his employment.
Findings of fact of the Workmen’s Compensation Board are conclusive on the courts where there is any evidence to support them. Butler v. Mitchell, 49 Ga. App. 315 (175 S. E. 271), and citations. The evidence before the single director here authorized the finding of fact and the conclusion of law reached by him, namely, that the deceased was in the employ of the defendants at the time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cooper v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. CurrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. CloreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. ManghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Butler v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lockhart v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Brown v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Jose Andrade Painting v. JaimesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993