Legal Opinion

Schuck v. West Side Belt R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1925No. Appeal, 14PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Simpson,

Complaining that he was awarded an inadequate sum of money, plaintiff appeals from a judgment, entered on a jury’s verdict, assessing damages for the taking of his property under the right of eminent domain. Considering his evidence alone, the verdict is inadequate; weighing only that offered by defendant, the recovery was excessive. Which was entitled to the greatest weight, was a question for the jury, under proper instructions from the trial judge; and the latter, who saw the witnesses, and the court in banc, — aided by consultation with him, after argument on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  2. Tiffany v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Muntz v. Cottage Hill Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. 60.14 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Warren and McKean Counties, State of Pennsylvania, and Arthur W. SeibelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. Jarvis v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. In re Appropriation of Property of EllisOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Blair v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Moraski v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API