Legal Opinion

Samuel S. Jackson v. Terrell Don Hutto, Commissioner, Arkansas Department of Correction

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1975No. 74-1711PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Samuel S. Jackson, an Arkansas state prisoner, seeks relief in federal court from a state conviction and incarceration for robbery. Essentially, Jackson presents two grounds in support of his contention that he was convicted in violation of his constitutional rights:

1) the Arkansas trial court did not instruct the jury on the limited credibility to be given accomplice testimony; and

2) the trial judge, in the absence of the defendant, orally communicated with the jury on several occasions during jury deliberations.

Jackson raised these matters on direct appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court but…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Shields v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. United States v. George Crutcher, Hampton C. Hazel, Also Known as Robert Jones, and John PayneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Perry York, United States of America v. Peter Andrew RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Earl Deberry v. Charles Wolff, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Cramer v. FahnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. James Harold HoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API