United States v. James Harold Hood
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
James Harold Hood appeals from his conviction of interstate transportation of stolen goods with a value in excess of $5,000, knowing the same to have been stolen, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. We affirm.
I
Hood first contends that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial by the government’s unreasonable delay in filing charges against him. He contends that although the Federal Bureau of Investigation was aware of the facts alleged in the indictment by October, 1975, twenty months elapsed between that time and the time that the indictment on which he…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. DardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- United States v. Claude Leander RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Benson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.