Aycinena v. Peries
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
THIS was an action of assumpsit for money had and received, brought in this court by Mariano de Aycinena, executor of Juan Fermin de Aycinena, against Adolphus Peries. It was tried before Rogers, J., at Nisi Prius, and now came before this court on certificate of error. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court. The case was argued by
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Rogers, J.
This is an action for money had and received, in the nature of a bill in chancery, to recover a fund in the hands of the defendant, in payment of the amount of a judgment recovered by the plaintiff from the defendant as the administrator of James Yard, deceased. After the evidence was closed, the court charged the jury, that this was an action for money had and received, brought by the executor'of Fermin de Aycinena against A. Peries. That to maintain the action it was necessary for the plaintiff to show that he did now, or at one time had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clemson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813
- Gray v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
- Vanarsdale v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
- Rush v. GoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1826
3Cited by16 opinions
- Church v. RulandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Pringle v. PringleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Smith v. KeenerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Pratt v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Biddle v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.