Rush v. Good
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
IN ERROR. The record of this case, having been returned on a writ of error to the Common Pleas of Lancaster county, the questions arising upon it were argued by
1Opinion of the Court
The facts connected with the points decided, and every thing necessary to enable the reader to understand 'them, will be found in the opinion of the. court, which was delivered by
Huston, J.
John Good, the plaintiff below, brought this suit against Hcriry Rush, Adam Goehinoer and Samuel B. Moore, styling them trustees of Benjamin Hart^.
*227The declaration contained two counts. The first stated, in substance, that Benjamin Hart, on the 1st of January,, 1S16, was indebted to John Good in the sum of eight thousand doliars, and promised to pay the same. That afterwards, on the 13th of April, 1816, by a…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Aycinena v. PeriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
- Gray v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835