State v. Blackwell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of two counts of possession with intent to sell cocaine and two counts of selling cocaine. As defendant was not served with notice of the State’s intent to use laboratory reports “as evidence of the identity, nature and quantity of any and all controlled substances or alleged controlled substances seized[,]” we grant defendant a new trial.
I. Background
On or about 9 February 2009, defendant was indicted for two counts of possession with intent to sell and deliver cocaine and two counts of selling cocaine in 2008. Defendant was also indicted for obtaining…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. BoddenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. LeyvaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. MoultryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.