Legal Opinion

Langston v. Willis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1965No. 2080PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YARRUT, Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal because Defendant filed his appeal bond one day too late. Plaintiff relies on LSA-C.C. P. art. 2087 which provides that a devolu-tive appeal must be taken and the security furnished therefor within 90 days after the expiration of the delay for applying for a new trial when no application for a new trial has been filed.

Under LSA-C.C.P. art. 1974, the delay for applying for a new trial is three days, exclusive of holidays. Because the Defendant was personally served, the delay commenced to run the day after the default judgment was signed.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Britt v. BrocatoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Danna v. Yazoo M v. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. CocrehamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. Loftin v. KnostLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Succession of JacksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Bergeron v. Oil Field Specialties, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Danel-Ryder, Inc. v. Van WayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API