Legal Opinion

Wattenburger v. Railroad Commission of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 28, 1950No. 9893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal under Section 20 of Article 911b, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. by D. C. Wattenburger, trustee in bankruptcy for Mid-Continent Truck Service, as a party dissatisfied with an order of the Railroad Commission of Texas entered June 16, 1948, cancelling Specialized Motor Carrier Certificate No. 5542 issued to C. H. Clary, Eva Maud Clary, and Charles Herman Clary, Jr., doing business as Mid-Continent Truck Service, on September 3, 1947.

Trial was to the court without a jury, and at the conclusion thereof the court rendered judgment upholding the validity of the order…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Webster v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. City of Wichita Falls v. Bowen, TrusteeTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Miller v. TarryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown Express, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Roberdeau v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Stotts v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Brown Express, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Roberdeau v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API