Legal Opinion

Stotts v. Railroad Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1951No. 9933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

This suit was brought by H. W. Stotts, appellant, to set aside an order of the Railroad Commission of Texas, cancelling appellant’s certificates of convenience and necessity, Nos. 5509 and 6313. These certificates authorized appellant to operate a motor truck service between certain designated points in Texas for the purpose of transporting certain named commodities for compensation.

Trial before the court resulted in a judgment sustaining the order of cancellation.

Appellant’s first point is that the Railroad Commission has no judicial powers and was, therefore, without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wattenburger v. Railroad Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alamo Express, Inc. v. Union City TransferTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brown Express, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Railroad Commission of Texas v. QuernerTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Brown Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Alamo Express, Inc. v. Union City TransferTexas Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API