Legal Opinion

Olah v. Slobodian

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 24, 1990PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

In this case, as in Scafidi v. Seiler, 119 N.J. 93, 574 A.2d 398 (1990), also decided today, we consider application of the doctrine of increased risk, see Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399, *122471 A.2d 405 (1984), in medical-malpractice litigation. The primary issue in this appeal is the correctness of the trial court’s instruction to the jury on the causal relationship between the alleged negligence of the defendant-physicians and the patient’s death. The trial court instructed the jury that proximate cause would be established if it found…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Evers v. DollingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. Hake v. Manchester TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. Harris v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Verdicchio v. RiccaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. Lanzet v. GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. Wilson v. Wal-Mart StoresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API