Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The defendant appeals to this court from a judgment finding him guilty of the crime of grand larceny; the subject matter of the alleged theft was an automobile. He contends that the court erred when it denied a motion made by him at the beginning of the trial requiring the state to specify some particular day as the time of the alleged theft. January 5, 1927, was the time specified in the indictment. Counsel stated, “We move for the reason that if the state stands on the fifth day of January, 1927, the defendant Jim Cushman intends to and can and will prove an absolute alibi.” The motion was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. MorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State v. PomeroyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State v. KeelenOregon Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. MullinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. State v. ChandlerOregon Supreme Court · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API