Legal Opinion

State v. Mullin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1957No. 49209PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarsoN, J.

The sole question before us in this appeal is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error by permitting jury consideration of a written confession allegedly procured as a result of inducements made by an interrogating officer.

Defendant, Mullin, an employee of the Des Moines Post Office, was accused of entering the rural home of Mrs. Trent, assaulting her, and taking from her some forty-five dollars in currency. She noted his ear license, and through this information defendant was apprehended and taken before Mrs. Trent, who identified him. He was then taken to the county jail and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Ashcraft v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Lyons v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. State of Iowa v. Kenneth Lee MadsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. State v. HodgesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. State v. WareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API