Roth v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, -by motion, seek an order, (1) striking ■ the third-party complaint against Samuel J. Lefrak, the third-party defendant, and (2) compelling John Tully and James Ricciardi, referred to in the moving papers as “agents of the defendant, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc.,” to testify as to their salaries.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are owners of certain premises located in the County of Queens, City and State of New York; and that the defendant, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the A & P), some time…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp., AGSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dunn v. . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.