Legal Opinion
Yuan v. Eightfold AI Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 30, 2025No. 4:24-cv-04238Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TANGGANG “DAN” YUAN, Case No. 24-cv-04238-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 EIGHTFOLD AI INC., Re: Dkt. No. 74 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Eightfold AI’s (“Eightfold”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff 14 Tanggang “Dan” Yuan’s Massachusetts state law claims for failure to state a claim. ECF 74. 15 Because the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument, the Court VACATES the 16 hearing set for June 5, 2025. See Civ. L.R. 7-6. Having carefully considered the parties’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.