Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Cukr

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1951No. 2473PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*7OPINION

Rinee, Justice.

This direct appeal proceeding brings a judgment of the District Court of Laramie County here for review. The action wherein this judgment was rendered arises out of an automobile collision resulting in the death of *8John Wilhelm plaintiff’s intestate. The parties to the action, Leo Wilhelm who, as administrator of the estate of John Wilhelm, deceased, plaintiff below and now appellant began this litigation in the court aforesaid against Eugene H. Cukr as defendant, now the respondent, will be hereinafter usually referred to as designated in the trial court aforesaid.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Adams v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Fleenor v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Wright v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Combined Insurance Co. of America v. SinclairWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Daily v. BoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Culver v. SekulichWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Gish v. ColsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Weidt v. Brannan Motor Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API