Legal Opinion

Katz v. Wolf

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 15, 1896Published

Appeal by defendant from judgment of the Fourth District Court. '

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The plaintiff furnished an estimate to do certain - work on the "defendant’s house for' $75. He testified that he did ' all the work1 agreed to be done, and received $30 on account. "The1 justice gave judgment in favor of "the plaintiff for $45, the' balance due. Plaintiff also claimed $11 for extra work, but this .the justice disallowed.

The question of performance was" decided on conflicting testimony, the plaintiff testifying one way and the defendant’s agent the other. ' The finding of'the. justice upon that disputed question of fact is sufficiently sustained by the evidence,- and. cannot…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carroll v. O'SheaNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  2. Frankel v. WolfNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API