Legal Opinion

Frankel v. Wolf

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from fourth district court. Action by Eugene Frankel against Lucian Wolf to recover on defendant’s alleged promise to pay plaintiff a commission on the sale of chattels. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

This is an action for commissions. No express employment of the plaintiff by the defendant, with regard to this transaction, is shown by the evidence, and the cause of action rests upon a promise, claimed to have been made to the plaintiff by the defendant at the time when the purchaser was brought to him by such plaintiff, to pay the commission in question. There was no dispute that the sale took place, and it is not contradicted that the value of the goods sold was $1,800. Conflict appears upon the questions whether plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sale,' and whether any promise was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tooley v. . BaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Myers v. CohnNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  3. Mead v. . SheaNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Wennerstrom v. KellyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  5. Carroll v. O'SheaNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. United ArtisansOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Hertz v. MinzesheimerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  4. Katz v. WolfAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  5. Kidder v. JonesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API