Lemelle v. St. Charles Gaming Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AMY, Judge.
The defendant gaming company claims that the trial court erred in granting a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, who was injured while intoxicated aboard a riverboat casino owned by the defendant. Although the trial court determined that the riverboat casino was a vessel for purposes of general maritime law in its ruling, the defendant again urges its own motion for summary judgment on the issue of vessel status. For the following reasons, we reverse the summary judgment entered by the trial court and render *2summary judgment in favor of the defendant. We remand for further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Strong v. B.P. Exploration & Production, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Board of Com'rs of Orleans v. M/V Belle of OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- De La Rosa v. St Charles Gaming CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Benoit v. St. Charles Gaming Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Warrior Energy Services Corp. v. ATP TitanDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Carl Joseph Benoit and Patricia Faye Benoit v. St. Charles Gaming Company, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Don Caldwell, Individually and Sheronda Caldwell, Individually v. St. Charles Gaming Company D/B/A Isle of Capri Casino-Lake CharlesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Don Caldwell, Individually and Sheronda Caldwell, Individually v. St. Charles Gaming Company D/B/A Isle of Capri Casino-Lake CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.