Warrior Energy Services Corp. v. ATP Titan
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.1 Also before the Court are plaintiffs’ motions to deem in rem jurisdiction perfected2 or, in the alternative, to issue a warrant for arrest3 and to appoint a consent guardian.4 For the following reasons, the Court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss and denies plaintiffs’ motions as moot.
I. BACKGROUND
This dispute stems from fees allegedly owed to plaintiffs for tools and services provided to the ATP TITAN, a floating production facility moored approximately 65 miles…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Baker v. PutnalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Contango Operators, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Riley v. Alexander/Ryan Marine Services Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Turnkey Offshore Project Services, LLC v. JAB Energy Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021