Legal Opinion

Beer v. Martel

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 31, 1932PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank, P. J.

This suit was brought by Herman L. Beer to recover damages for alleged personal injuries. Beer died before the ease was tried in the circuit court and the cause was revived in the name of respondents as executors of his estate. The trial resulted in a verdict for defendant. On motion of plaintiffs the verdict was set aside and a new trial granted. Defendant appealed.

The verdict was rendered at the February Term, 1929. At the same term and within four days after the verdict, plaintiff’s motion for new trial was filed. At the following October Term, 1929, plaintiff’s motion for new trial was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Givens v. Van StuddifordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Walter v. ScofieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Noren v. American School of OsteopathyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Sutton v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Longan v. Kansas City Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Albert J. Hoppe, Inc. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Castorina v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Kelso v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Gathright v. PendegraftSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Lee v. Baltimore Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API