Oregon King Min. Co. v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District ■of Oregon. See 110 Fed. 728.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The Oregon King Mining Company, the plaintiff in error, commenced proceedings in the United States land •office at The Dalles, Or., to procure a patent for a certain mining *49claim, called the “Silver King.” At the time of its application the company was in possession of the claim, and is so still. The defendants in error contested the application, and, in support of their adverse claim, commenced, pursuant to the provisions of section 2326 of the Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1430], the present action in the court below to determine the conflicting claims to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gleeson v. Martin White Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
- North Noonday Mining Co. v. Orient Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880
- McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kern Oil Co. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Scott v. FrazierDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1919
- Holdt v. HazardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909