Holdt v. Hazard
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action- to recover possession of three certain mining claims from which it is alleged plaintiffs were ousted by defendants. Judgment went for plaintiffs, from which, and an order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants prosecute this appeal.
The complaint alleges that on November 16, 1906, and at the time of instituting the suit, plaintiffs, who were partners for the purpose of working the same, were the owners, in possession of, and entitled to the possession of, three certain mining claims situated in section 33, township 28 south, range 11 east, Mount Diablo meridian,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Gleeson v. Martin White Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
- North Noonday Mining Co. v. Orient Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880
- Billings v. Aspen Mining & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perley v. GoarArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Minner v. SadlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943