Legal Opinion
Fort Hill Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Insurance
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided April 2, 1984No. 0142PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gardner, Judge:
Respondent Fort Hill Federal Savings and Loan Association seeks a declaratory judgment that appellant South Carolina Farm Bureau Insurance Company is liable to it on a fire insurance policy issued to a Mr. and Mrs. Johnston. The policy contained a standard mortgagee clause naming Fort Hill as loss-payee. The Johnstons gave a bad check for the premium and by separate action Farm Bureau was absolved of liability to the Johnstons. The appealed order held Farm Bureau liable to Fort Hill.
We affirm.
Pertinent facts are: (1) upon receipt of the Johnston check, Farm Bureau, on October…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Union Institution for Savings v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Walker v. Queen Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Franklin Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Financial Corp. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HuntSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Waterstone Bank, SSB v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
- Valley National Bank v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Toups Marine Transport, Inc. v. Zurich InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.