Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Economy Preferred Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 7, 1999No. 99-0762PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

¶ 1. Danielle and James Metz and their insurer, Economy Preferred Insurance Company, (collectively Economy) appeal the circuit court's decision denying their motion for summary judgment and granting Badger Mutual Insurance Company's opposing motion. Economy also appeals the circuit court's decision finding its arguments frivolous and assessing sanctions. Economy argues that: (1) Badger's "pay and walk" policy provision is invalid; (2) Badger breached its duty to defend and indemnify the Metzes; and (3) Economy's arguments were not frivolous. We conclude that Badger's policy language was valid…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Estate of Balkus v. Security First National Bank of Sheboygan Trust DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. In Matter of Estate of BilsieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Gross v. Lloyds of London InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Schlieper v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Waukesha Cnty. v. S.L.L. (In Re Mental Commitment of S.L.L.)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Chao KongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  3. Derrick A. Sanders v. State of Wisconsin Claims BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Shadley v. Lloyds of LondonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  5. State v. LittlejohnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API