Legal Opinion
People v. Enriquez
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 1996No. H013717PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
In this action we hold that when a jury is instructed pursuant to CALJIC No. 12.65 (1992 rev.) an instruction defining “under the influence” such as set forth in CALJIC No. 16.831 (1992 rev.) must also be given.
Facts and Procedural History
On June 19, 1994, after smoking a cigarette laced with phencyclidine (PCP), defendant and Christine Martinez were outside Martinez’s mother’s house at 369 Fleming Avenue. When her mother came to the door, she observed Christine was under the influence of PCP and told her she had to leave. Her mother then called 911.
Reserve Deputy Sheriff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Gilbert v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. ShoalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. WeathingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Byrd v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Paul M.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. BuiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- State v. PolaskiMontana Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.