Legal Opinion

Wayne Biggs and Melba Canegata Biggs v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use Appeals. Appeal of Ten Kirkegade Corporation, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 7, 1989No. 88-3674PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.

I

Ten Kirkegade Corporation (Kirkegade) appeals from a final order of the District Court of the Virgin Islands. Kirkegade, as intervenor, had filed a motion requesting that the district court dismiss Wayne and Melba Biggses’ petition for a writ of review of a decision by the Board of Land Use Appeals (Board) because of late filing. Kirkegade argued that the July 27, 1988 petition was untimely because it was filed more than thirty days after the Board’s June 14, 1988 decision. The district court rejected this argument, holding that under V.I.Code…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Traxler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  3. Traxler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. George M. Stringer v. United States of America, and Ira G. Chambless, Internal Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Wilfred C. Rice and Martha J. Rice v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Virgin Islands Conservation So v. Virgin Islands Board of Land UCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  2. Biggs v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use AppealsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1990
  3. GROSS v. COLOPLAST CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API