Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. C. C./ohio A. v. Ohio E.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2004No. 02AP-574PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

OPINION

{¶ 1} Relators, Common Cause/Ohio and Alliance for Democracy ("relators"), appeal the decision of the magistrate denying a writ of mandamus. For the reasons that follow, we adopt the decision of the magistrate and deny the writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} This case arose from a series of advertisements ("ads") run by the Chamber of Commerce ("Chamber") and an affiliated organization, Citizens for a Strong Ohio ("CSO") during the 2000 election of Ohio Supreme Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Earl v. Ohio Elections Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Democratic Party v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API