Legal Opinion
In Re Hubert McCarthy
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 31, 1985No. Appeal 84-1682PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Hubert McCarthy appeals from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals (Board) upholding the Examiner’s rejection of claims 16-19 of patent application Serial No. 302,134 as unpatentable for failure to meet the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 103. We affirm.
I
Mr. McCarthy’s invention relates to shipping form units to be adhered to the outside of a container, to provide an accompanying weatherproof and damage-resistant set of form sheets. As shown below in a modified version of Figure 6 of the patent application, the unit includes first and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Union Carbide Corporation v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Francis J.A.M.C. De Blauwe and Frank K.A. SelleslagsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Application of Richard E. Warner and Virginia Ann WarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In re CarletonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- In Re the Successor in Interest to Walter AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
3Cited by12 opinions
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Iron Grip Barbell Company, Inc., and York Barbell Company, Inc. v. USA Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- In Re Hans OetikerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Burlington Industries, Inc., John D. Neefus, and Frederick M. Shofner v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- In Re Burt F. RaynesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.