Legal Opinion

Kinder v. Looney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The Arkansas Railroad Commission gave J. P. Looney what was termed a certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate motor busses over the same route and practically under the same schedule as attempted to be operated by the Union Bus Line.

In 5 Pomeroy’s Eq. Jur. (2 ed. § 2016), it is said that an injunction is the appropriate remedy to protect a party in the enjoyment of an exclusive franchise against continuous encroachments. Prof. Pomeroy said that “the jurisdiction rests on the firm and satisfactory ground of its necessity to avoid a ruinous…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mason v. Intercity Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Salt Creek Transp. Co. v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. West Memphis Power & Water Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. North Little Rock Transportation Co. v. City of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Baltimore Steam Co. v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Arkansas Railroad Commission v. Independent Bus LineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API