Legal Opinion
Fina Oil and Chemical Co. v. Salinas
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided April 28, 1988No. 13-88-079-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*33OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
Fina Oil and Chemical Company (Fina) seeks a writ of mandamus directing Judge Homer Salinas of the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County to set aside his order denying discovery of certain documents in the possession of Texas Employers Insurance Company (TEIA). TEIA contends the documents are privileged under the investigative and attorney-client privileges. Tex. R.Civ.P. 166b(3)(d), 166b(3)(e), and Tex.R. Evid. 503. We hold that TEIA has failed to meet its burden of establishing the privileges. We, therefore, hold that the trial court abused its discretion in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peeples v. Honorable Fourth Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Jordan v. Honorable Court of Appeals for the Fourth Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- EF Hutton & Co., Inc. v. YoungbloodTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Hobson v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cameron County v. Hinojosa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Hyundai Motor America v. O'NEILL, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Trailways, Inc. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Fina Oil and Chemical Co. v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Hyundai Motor America v. O'NEILL, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.