Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2011No. 10-1437Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWynn, Circuit Judge
Like Judge Motz, I join Judge Gilman’s conclusion that the conspiracy claim was properly dismissed because an agreement was not sufficiently alleged. I also join Judge Gilman’s conclusion that the retaliation claim was properly dismissed because Virginia Commonwealth University’s (“VCU”) alleged promise to provide transportation was merely gratuitous. However, I disagree with Judge Gilman’s and Judge Motz’s conclusion that A Society Without A Name’s (“ASWAN”) claims under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Equal Protection Clause, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Southern Environmental Law Center, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Garcia v. BrockwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Wolsky v. Medical College Of Hampton RoadsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.