Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Puerto Rico S.S. Ass'n Etc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 26, 1954No. 4779PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of an order issued March 30, 1953, after proceedings in the usual course upon a consolidated complaint under § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 146, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), against Puerto Rico Steamship Association together with its member companies and South Porto Rico Sugar Company, and also against various labor organizations as co-respondents.
It was found by the Board that by executing and enforcing contracts containing illegal hiring provisions, the employer-respondents thereby violated § 8 (a)(1)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Katz v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pinkerton's Nat. Detective Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Auburn Curtain Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 57, International Union of Operating EngineersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Consolidated Constructors And Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- National Cash Register Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bull Insular Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. Consolidated Constructors & Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- The National Cash Register Company v. National Labor Relations Board, National Cash Register Employees' Independent Union v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972