Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Sprague

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 21, 2003No. 02-028Published

1Concurrence

Amestoy, C.J.,

¶ 35. concurring. When the public’s interest in the safety of its law enforcement officers is weighed against the relatively minor intrusion upon the privacy interest of a driver ordered out of a lawfully stopped vehicle, safety must prevail. Under the rule formulated by the United States Supreme Court in Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 111 (1977), and endorsed by a majority of the states, a law enforcement officer may, consistent with the Fourth Amendment, *137routinely require the driver to exit a lawfully stopped motor vehicle. This rule recognizes that a police officer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. StampleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. State v. StoneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API