T.B. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Judge.
We affirm an order adjudicating Appellant delinquent. The trial court did not err by admitting a photograph of the victim’s injury notwithstanding that proof of victim injury is not a required element on a charge of aggravated battery by use of a deadly weapon. We consider this opinion en banc in order to clarify our opinion in Clark v. State, 632 So.2d 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
The photograph was of the victim’s face allegedly cut by Appellant, using a razor. Several other photos of the victim’s body allegedly cut by a codefendant, using a broken bottle, were excluded on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Castor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Arthur v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Servis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Snell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Fryer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Buckner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.