Legal Opinion
Barfield v. Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided August 21, 2015No. Case No. 2:11-CV-04321-NKLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Add Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(3) Information to Judgment, [Doc. 695], and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of a Plan of Allocation of the Judgment Funds and for Rule 54(b) Certification, [Doc. 717]. For the reasons set forth below, the former is granted, and the latter is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
After a five day jury trial on the issue of damages, a jury returned a verdict awarding Plaintiffs $79,014,140 for claims arising out of the Sho-Me Defendants’ 1(hereinafter ShoMe)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers Bodine Produce Company, Inc. Robert Fletcher, D/B/A Fletcher FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Parks v. PavkovicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Krakauer v. Dish Network, L. L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019