Legal Opinion

Allen v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 28, 1975No. 1295-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

In a post-divorce petition to modify the custody provisions of the decree, the trial court granted an in-trial oral motion of the petitioner’s counsel to vacate the entire decree of divorce on the grounds that the parties had cohabited while the trial of the original action was pending. The ruling was made despite the fact that both parties had married other persons in reliance upon the decree.

For the reasons stated below, we hold that the order vacating the decree was an abuse of discretion and the order is reversed and the decree of divorce reinstated.

Respondent, Judy A. Jones, had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rankin v. FerriterWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Roth v. NashWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Klettke v. KlettkeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lasell v. BeckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Murray v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of MaddixCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  2. Stoulil v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Stoulil v. EDWIN A. EPSTEIN, JR., OPERATINGCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Harwinder Singh v. Rajdeep KaurCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API