Legal Opinion

United States v. Morales

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 18, 2009No. Docket 07-4202-cr (L), 07-5529-cr (Con)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We review the determination of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Koeltl, J.) that the government committed only a clerical error subject to correction at any time, see 21 U.S.C. § 851(a)(1), when it cited only the lower of the two applicable prior-narcotics-felony enhancements in the prior felony information served on defendant Ramon Morales before trial. We hold that a remand is required in order that the District Court may determine whether Morales was prejudiced by the government’s omission.

The federal narcotics laws require that the sentence for a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. LaBonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. Ivania Maria Couto, Also Known as Sealed Dft 35Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Rudolph WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Michelle Kidd and Goyce Rates, et al. v. Maria Pappas, et al.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  4. United States v. Dwaine AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. FultonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API