Legal Opinion

Hudson Oil Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1935No. 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

These proceedings in error were brought by the Hudson Oil Company, hereinafter usually referred to as the “Oil Company” or the “plaintiff,” as plaintiff in error, against The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Fremont, Wyoming, for convenience designated subsequently herein “the County Board,” as defendant in error, to review a judgment of the district court of Fremont County, which declined to allow the plaintiff any recovery for certain taxes alleged to be illegal and wrongfully collected by and paid by it under protest to the County Treasurer of said County.

The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Gillespie v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Board of the County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Boyd Van Fleet v. Marceline A. GuyetteWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Amoco Production Company v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CARBON COUNTYWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Amoco Production Company v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CARBON COUNTYWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hudson Oil Co. v. Board of Com'rs.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API