Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Board of the County Commissioners
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Justice.
The primary question presented in this appeal concerns the propriety of refunding state ad valorem taxes collected on oil production subsequently determined to be the property of the United States. Appellant, Atlantic Richfield Company (hereinafter usually referred to as ARCO), raises this question in the context of an appeal from a judgment of the Second Judicial District Court of Wyoming, which affirmed the decision of the Board of County Commissioners of Sweetwater County (hereafter the Board) refusing to refund such taxes.
ARCO, as the successor by merger of the Sinclair Oil…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bunten v. Rock Springs Grazing Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Parr-Richmond Industrial Corp. v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Bibbins v. W. W. Clark & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Kelley v. RhoadsWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
- Clay County v. Brown Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. Teton County Youth Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Wyodak Resources Development Corp. v. Wyoming Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Williams Production RMT Company v. STATE OF WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF REVENUEWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Amoco Production Co. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Amoco Production Company v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CARBON COUNTYWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.