Legal Opinion
Butchkosky v. Enstrom Helicopter Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 8, 1993No. 91-10007-CIVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ENSTROM HELICOPTER CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Enstrom Helicopter Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on October 1, 1993. (D.E. # 107). In its Motion, Enstrom argues that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by Florida’s twelve-year statute of repose for products liability claims. Fla.Stat. § 95.031(2) (repealed effective July 9, 1986). At a hearing held on March 24, 1993, this Court addressed a previous summary judgment motion on the same statute of repose issue. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Warrior Tombigbee Transportation Company, Inc. v. M/v Nan Fung Etc., John K. Irish, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Ernest Leon Clemons v. Dougherty County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,905 Shirley Black v. Henry Pratt Company and Amsted IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Perez v. Lockheed Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Robinson v. Hartzell Propeller Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Burroughs v. Precision Airmotive Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Alter v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Larry Crouch v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.