Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Palmer v. Woodbury

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Twelfth District.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This was a proceeding in the nature of a quo warranto, to determine the right of the Respondent to the appointment or place of Pilot of the Port of San Francisco. Woodbury was appointed by the Board of Pilot Commissioners. The Act of May 11th, 1854, (Session Acts, 49,) provides that the Governor shall appoint two resident merchants and two experienced shipmasters, who, with the President of the Chamber of Commerce, shall ■ constitute the Board of Commissioners. The Act gives them power to appoint in the manner prescribed therein, such number of Pilots as they may deem necessary, not exceeding…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People Ex Rel. Skelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  4. State ex inf. Barker v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  5. People ex rel. Samuel v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API