Legal Opinion

State v. Bilal

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1989No. A89A0048PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Appellee was convicted by a jury of selling a dangerous drug in contravention of OCGA §§ 16-13-71 and 16-13-72. After trial, appellee made a motion for new trial and/or motion for directed verdict of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court, troubled by the fact that the conviction resulted from the retail sale by a clerk of two small bottles labeled “Rush” and “Locker Room” which contained isobutyl nitrate, an isomer of the prohibited drug, butyl nitrate, granted appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. This was after the trial court denied a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Darden v. RavanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Potts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. Lamons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Crowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Rhyne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Rivers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. State v. CanupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API