People v. De Lago
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
Appellant occupied one apartment in a four-apartment structure known as 2 and 3 Abendroth Place, Port Chester, New York. Policy slips and other gambling paraphernalia were found in his apartment in a search thereof by the police made pursuant to a warrant commanding the search of ‘ ‘ the structure, located at premises 2 and 3 Abendroth Place, Port Chester, New York, believed to be the framed [sic] dwelling occupied by one Anthony De Lago ”. We regard this phraseology as sufficiently ambiguous to justify looking to the caption of the warrant for clarification (People v. Martell, 16 N Y 2d 245;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Accarino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- People v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
3Cited by47 opinions
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- United States v. Phillip MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.