Legal Opinion

State v. Yancy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1979No. 45489PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The appellant was found guilty of violating RCW 9A.88.070(l)(b), which provides:(1) A person is guilty of promoting prostitution in the first degree if he knowingly:(b) Advances or profits from prostitution of a person less than eighteen years old.

RCW 9A.88.060 provides in part:

The following definitions are applicable in RCW 9A.88.070 through 9A.88.090:

*155(2) "Profits from prostitution." A person "profits from prostitution" if, acting other than as a prostitute receiving compensation for personally rendered prostitution services, he accepts or receives money or other property pursuant to an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. DanaWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. City of Bellevue v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Blondheim v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. City of Seattle v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hontz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. PachecoWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Yakima v. EmmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. State v. KeesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API