State v. Yancy
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The appellant was found guilty of violating RCW 9A.88.070(l)(b), which provides:(1) A person is guilty of promoting prostitution in the first degree if he knowingly:(b) Advances or profits from prostitution of a person less than eighteen years old.
RCW 9A.88.060 provides in part:
The following definitions are applicable in RCW 9A.88.070 through 9A.88.090:
*155(2) "Profits from prostitution." A person "profits from prostitution" if, acting other than as a prostitute receiving compensation for personally rendered prostitution services, he accepts or receives money or other property pursuant to an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. DanaWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Bellevue v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Blondheim v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Seattle v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Hontz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PachecoWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Yakima v. EmmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- State v. KeesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.