Legal Opinion
Riso Kagaku Corp. v. A. B. Dick Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 7, 1969No. 68 Civ. 4414PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLANDS, District Judge:
Three interrelated motions are before the Court, disposition of which turns on essentially the same criteria. Only a brief factual background is necessary for a full understanding of the problem.
Defendant — A. B. Dick Company (Dick) is the holder of a patent on the method of manufacturing stencils for use on a mimeograph-type duplicating machine. Application of the patented process creates a stencil from a certain type of thermoplastic film which then can be used on the mimeograph-duplicating machine to provide the desired number of copies.
Plaintiff — Riso…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Mattel, Inc. v. Louis Marx & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. KungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Peyser v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Sweetheart Plastics, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hernandez v. Graebel Van LinesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Car-Freshner Corp. v. Auto Aid Manufacturing Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1977
- Heyco, Inc. v. HeymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Essex Crane Rental Corp. v. Vic Kirsch Construction Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- General State Authority ex rel. Crompton-Richmond Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.