Legal Opinion
Carrasco v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided April 30, 1986No. 892-83PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Appellant was charged with felony possession of a controlled substance, to wit, cocaine. After a pretrial motion to suppress the search was denied, appellant plead nolo contendere and stipulated to the evidence in such a manner as to preserve error. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed her punishment at three years probated and a five hundred dollar fine.
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and remanded for a new trial. See Carrasco v. State, No. B14-82-861-CR (Tex.App. — Houston [14th]…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Worthey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Porter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Elliott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Espericueta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.