Espericueta v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant, Valentin Es-pericueta, of Driving While Intoxicated. See Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 67011-l(b) (Vernon 1991). Punishment was assessed by the trial court at five years in the penitentiary, probated, and a $300.00 fine. By nine points of error, appellant complains that certain evidence should have been suppressed, the trial court should have submitted a jury instruction on the legality of the stop, the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction, and of other alleged errors. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Fisher, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
- Learning v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- McClain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.