Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Application of Thomas Ex Rel. Schmit

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1985No. 14306Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

RATIONALE ONE

For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in State v. Hotter, 340 N.W.2d 691, 694-95 (S.D.1983), and reiterated herein, I would reverse. I point out that the same sentencing judge in Hotter sentenced in this case. In Hotter, appellant was sentenced on May 4, 1982.

The circuit courts of South Dakota do not have the inherent power to suspend imposition or execution of sentences. State v. Marshall, 247 N.W.2d 484 (S.D.1976). It is a power conferred by Article V, § 5, of the South Dakota Constitution and is conferred “unless otherwise provided by law.” As stated in my dissent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HolterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. GriffeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API