Legal Opinion

Interurban St. Ry. Co. v. Menard

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 17, 1906No. 204PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon writ of error to review a judgment of the Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, in favor of defendant in error, who was plaintiff below, against plaintiff in error and the Holbrook, Cabot & Daly Contracting Company, whp were defendants below.

1Per curiam

Motion is made to dismiss the writ of error which was sued out by the railway company to review the judgment considered in Holbrook, Cabot & Daly Contracting Company v. Menard, opinion in which is herewith handed down (145 Fed. 498). There is nothing in the record to show summons and severance or its equivalent, and for the reasons set forth in that opinion the motion must be granted.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holbrook, Cabot & Daly Contracting Co. v. MenardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Baptist Home Mission Soc. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928